By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
  • Current
  • Art News
  • Art Exhibitions
  • Artists
  • Art Collectors
  • Art Events
  • About
  • Collaboration
Search
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: German Advisory Panel Rejects Claims to Two George Grosz Paintings
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Current
  • Art News
  • Art Exhibitions
  • Artists
  • Art Collectors
  • Art Events
  • About
  • Collaboration
  • Advertise
2024 © BublikArt Gallery. All Rights Reserved.
BublikArt Gallery > Blog > Art News > German Advisory Panel Rejects Claims to Two George Grosz Paintings
Art News

German Advisory Panel Rejects Claims to Two George Grosz Paintings

Irina Runkel
Last updated: 31 October 2024 21:14
Published 31 October 2024
Share
2 Min Read
SHARE


A German advisory panel that oversees claims related to the Nazi-looted art in the countries’ national museum collection has rejected a restitution claim for two paintings by George Grosz held by the Bremen Kunsthalle. The panel claims there isn’t sufficient evidence to support claims the works were lost due to the artist’s persecution.

Grosz was a German painter who is best known for his images of Berlin during the 1920s. He is associated with the Neue Sachlichkeit movement, which marked a return to more naturalistic forms of painting after the Expressionist movement.

Related Articles

Before fleeing Germany during the early 1930s, Grosz faced persecution because he spoke out against the Nazis. He was among the many modernists who produced work that was subsequently labeled “degenerate art” by the Nazis in the mid- and late 1930s.

Grosz’s heirs filed official claim for legal title over the two works made prior to the artist’s departure from Germany. The panel claimed the transfer of these two paintings, titled Pompe Funèbre (1928) and Still Life with Ocarina, Fish, and Shell (1931), from Grosz’s personal holdings wasn’t initiated as a result of religious persecution.

According to documentation related to the committee’s decision, Grosz transferred the work to his former dealer, Alfred Flechtheim.

The panel argued that the paintings were put on consignment with Flechtheim to settle a preexisting debt in the amount of 16,000 Reichsmarks before the Nazis rose to power in January 1933. Flechtheim, who was Jewish, represented Grosz between 1923 until 1931.

You Might Also Like

Women auto workers who helped inspire UK’s Equal Pay Act honoured in east London public sculpture – The Art Newspaper

Misan Harriman to step down as chair of London’s Southbank Centre – The Art Newspaper

Far-right candidate’s election in Colombia clouds future of long-delayed museum devoted to victims of armed conflict – The Art Newspaper

Morgan Library exhibition offers a visionary view of the history of Tarot – The Art Newspaper

Tate Britain and Turner Contemporary take their eco-missions beyond the gallery walls – The Art Newspaper

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Dreamlike Creatures and Spiritual Symbols Merge in Lou Benesch’s Watercolors — Colossal Dreamlike Creatures and Spiritual Symbols Merge in Lou Benesch’s Watercolors — Colossal
Next Article Christie’s Will Auction Two Joan Mitchells from Rockefeller University Christie’s Will Auction Two Joan Mitchells from Rockefeller University
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
2024 © BublikArt Gallery. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • About
  • Collaboration
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?