To receive Morning Links in your inbox every weekday, sign up for our Breakfast with ARTnews newsletter.
THE HEADLINES
WELL ENDOWED? Tate’s ambitious plan to build a £150 million ($201 million) endowment by 2030 has sparked debate across the UK museum sector about whether such a model could offer long-term sustainability, especially for smaller or regional institutions,The Art Newspaper reports. While endowments are a staple in the US, where top museums hold over $40 billion collectively, they remain rare in the UK. Tate’s new Tate Future Fund launched in June with over £43 million ($58 million) pledged, aims to ensure long-term financial resilience. The initiative was unveiled at a high-profile gala that raised £1 million ($1.34 million). Meanwhile, the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead launched a £10 million ($13 million) endowment, bolstered by a gift from musician Sting. Other UK museums have more quietly built such reserves: the British Museum holds nearly £50 million ($67 million), and the V&A benefits from a £10 million ($13 million) fund supporting its Gilbert Galleries. In a climate of dwindling public funding and rising costs, institutions like Modern Art Oxford describe endowments as appealing for the long-term stability they offer. Baltic director Sarah Munro says the fund will support free entry, community programs, and a shrinking artistic budget. The income will not replace existing public funding but supplement it for greater impact. However, experts warn the UK lacks a strong philanthropic culture, unlike the US. While Tate can tap wealthy donors and trustees, smaller organizations may struggle to raise such sums. Some fear that without systemic change, endowments may remain out of reach for most institutions, making this strategy viable only for a privileged few.
‘MOTHER & CHILD’ MISHANDLED. As Karen K. Ho reports for ARTnews, Matthiesen Gallery has filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkagainst convicted fraudster Thomas Austin Doyle, artist Shalva Sarukhanishvili, Jill Newhouse Gallery, and art collector Jon Landau. The London-based gallery alleges fraud, breach of contract, and other claims over the mishandling of Gustave Courbet’s Mother and Child on a Hammock (ca. 1844). According to the suit, Doyle told gallery director Patrick Matthiesen in 2024 that he had a buyer offering $550,000 and would broker the sale without commission. Instead, Doyle passed the painting to Sarukhanishvili, who allegedly sold it to Jill Newhouse Gallery for $115,000. That gallery then resold it to Landau for $125,000—well below its $650,000 market value. The painting had previously been exhibited at TEFAF New York and Maastricht . Doyle later admitted his deception in a March 2025 email. Efforts by Matthiesen to recover the painting or funds from Sarukhanishvili were ignored. The gallery claims Landau had seen the painting multiple times and knew its true value, yet refuses to return it. Landau and Jill Newhouse Gallery deny wrongdoing and vow to fight the allegations in court. Doyle has a history of art-related fraud, including a 2010 conviction.
THE DIGEST
The BBC explores the intricate beauty of Iznik tiles, uncovering their role in a long-overlooked golden age of Turkish art. [BBC]
Thirty paintings by the iconic, soft-spoken artist Bob Ross will soon be auctioned to help cover programming costs for small and rural public television stations facing federal funding cuts. [ABC News]
Martin Scorsese will host a conversation about the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art at New York’s Comic Con with artists JR, Boris Vallejo, and Julie Bell. [Daps Magic]
The ninth of 10 editions of Last Selfie by XCOPYART was acquired for a record-breaking $3.27 million (727 ETH), marking the highest sale for an editioned artwork to date in the tokenized art space. [X]
THE KICKER
MÉNAGE À TROIS. Admiral Nelson’s famous last words—“Kiss me, Hardy”—have long sparked schoolyard giggles, while his infamous love triangle with Lady Emma Hamilton and her husband Sir William Hamilton has added to his complex legacy, The Telegraph writes. That same triangle has even led some to view him as an unexpected queer icon. Now, the National Maritime Museum is re-examining Nelson’s life “through a queer lens” as part of its LGBTQ+ History Month programming. The event, titled “#NELSONFEST,” is hosted by The Queer History Club, a community-led LGBTQ+ research group. Promotional materials, since removed from the museum’s website, promised a talk exploring the “men who loved him” and expressed fascination with the so-called “Nelson-Hamilton thruple .” While some critics have labelled the event “bad history,” the museum is defending a broader look at queer narratives within maritime history. The same Queer History Night also includes talks on Lady Hamilton and highlights other figures who challenge traditional gender roles. Curators reference “cross-dressing Arctic explorers” and 19th-century sailors assigned female at birth who lived and worked as men, positioning them within early trans history. Though not named directly, figures such as James Clark Ross and Francis Crozier are linked to these narratives in materials discussing the cultural allure of polar exploration.
