By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
  • Current
  • Art News
  • Art Exhibitions
  • Artists
  • Art Collectors
  • Art Events
  • About
  • Collaboration
Search
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Phillips Sues Billionaire’s Son Over $14.5 M. Pollock Painting
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Current
  • Art News
  • Art Exhibitions
  • Artists
  • Art Collectors
  • Art Events
  • About
  • Collaboration
  • Advertise
2024 © BublikArt Gallery. All Rights Reserved.
BublikArt Gallery > Blog > Art Collectors > Phillips Sues Billionaire’s Son Over $14.5 M. Pollock Painting
Art Collectors

Phillips Sues Billionaire’s Son Over $14.5 M. Pollock Painting

Irina Runkel
Last updated: 15 July 2025 19:54
Published 15 July 2025
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE


In a lawsuit filed earlier this month, Phillips, one of the world’s top auction houses, claimed that a billionaire’s son failed to pay $14.5 million for a Jackson Pollock painting that sold in New York this past November.

The lawsuit, filed in the Supreme Court of New York, alleges that David Mimran, a film producer and the son of French businessman Jean Claude Mimran, had agreed to pay that sum as a third-party guarantee. Third-party guarantees, which have become common in major sales, especially since the onset of the pandemic, help auction houses defray the risk of offering art by bringing in an outside backer who agrees to buy a work, even if bidding does not break a certain barrier.

Related Articles

Documents submitted alongside the lawsuit, which was first reported by the New York Post over the weekend, suggest that the Pollock painting did not reach that amount when it came to sale. Per a third-party guarantee agreement submitted by Phillips, Mimran would have to pay just half of the $14.5 million if the work’s hammer price—an amount that does not account for additional fees—exceeded $14.2 million.

The Pollock piece, an early drip painting, was the Phillips sale’s top lot. Painted ca. 1948, it sold for $15.3 million with fees.

According to Phillips, Mimran sought an extension on his payment. “Mimran admitted that he owed the money, but he cried poverty and asked for more time,” the lawsuit reads. Then, he allegedly claimed he could not pay under that new deadline. The auction house is now seeking just under $15 million from Mimran—a figure that accounts for a 10 percent interest.

Mimran told Artnet News, “I love the painting and will buy it just a little late which happens often in this market and most auction houses had to deal with this.”

Mimran’s lawyer declined to comment to ARTnews and referred ARTnews to Mimran’s comments to Artnet.

He is the producer of films such as Warrior (2011), an acclaimed drama starring Tom Hardy as a boxer. He also formerly held a high-ranking position in Endeavor Mining, which has mines in Senegal.

“It’s astonishing that Mimran believes he can bid like a billionaire and then hide behind the claim that he’s broke,” Luke Nikas, a lawyer representing Phillips, said in an email to ARTnews. “If Mimran didn’t have a dollar to his name to pay for the artwork, as he claims, then he shouldn’t have raised a paddle.”

You Might Also Like

Laura Phipps Named Director of Gochman Family Collection

Brian Eno, Es Devlin, and Nan Goldin Works to Be Auctioned for Palestinian Aid

60 Percent of Sudan National Museum’s Holdings Have Been Looted

Conflict Between Art-Dealing Brothers Erupts in Assault Accusations

1,000-Year-Old Tomb in Panama Reveals Riches and Victims of Sacrifice

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article ‘Free art, with strings attached’: Zero Art Fair’s first edition in New York City puts a new spin on the old fair format – The Art Newspaper ‘Free art, with strings attached’: Zero Art Fair’s first edition in New York City puts a new spin on the old fair format – The Art Newspaper
Next Article WeTransfer Changes Terms of Service After Criticism on Licensing WeTransfer Changes Terms of Service After Criticism on Licensing
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
2024 © BublikArt Gallery. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • About
  • Collaboration
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?