By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
  • Current
  • Art News
  • Art Exhibitions
  • Artists
  • Art Collectors
  • Art Events
  • About
  • Collaboration
Search
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Artists score a victory in landmark AI copyright case
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Current
  • Art News
  • Art Exhibitions
  • Artists
  • Art Collectors
  • Art Events
  • About
  • Collaboration
  • Advertise
2024 © BublikArt Gallery. All Rights Reserved.
BublikArt Gallery > Blog > Art News > Artists score a victory in landmark AI copyright case
Art News

Artists score a victory in landmark AI copyright case

Irina Runkel
Last updated: 15 August 2024 03:01
Published 15 August 2024
Share
2 Min Read
SHARE



As the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and copyright continues to develop in the legal sphere, a group of visual artists have scored a small victory in court. On 12 August, US District Judge William Orrick ruled that the companies Stability AI, Midjourney, DeviantArt and Runway AI were violating artists’ rights by illegally storing their works in their image generation systems.

While Orrick refused to dismiss trademark claims related to the matter, he threw out accusations of unjust enrichment and breach of contract, in addition to allegations that the companies’ behaviours were in violation of a second US copyright law, Reuters reported.

The plaintiffs—illustrators Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz—first sued the AI companies in January 2023 in a landmark lawsuit against tech companies engaging in AI training. Judge Orrick dismissed most of their allegations last October, but allowed the artists to re-file. The original three plaintiffs, along with seven others who joined the lawsuit, returned with amendments in November, arguing that Stability AI’s Stable Diffusion model, which all the companies used, unlawfully contained “compressed copies” of their artwork.

In May, Judge Orrick decided in a tentative ruling to allow the copyright allegations to continue.

“The plausible inferences at this juncture are that Stable Diffusion by operation by end users creates copyright infringement and was created to facilitate that infringement by design,” Judge Orrick said.

This week’s ruling did not take on the central points of contention in the case—that the artists’ work was used to train AI systems in violation of their copyright. The AI companies claimed fair use, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act claims were ultimately dismissed with prejudice.

Lawyers for artists, Joseph Saveri and Matthew Butterick of Saveri Law Firm, called the decision “a significant step forward for the case” in a statement.

Judge Orrick’s ruling was delivered before a court hearing that was scheduled for today (14 August).

You Might Also Like

Pinakothek in Munich Returns Nazi-Looted Lesser Ury Painting

Pablo Picasso’s “Guernica” may leave Madrid for the first time in more than 30 years.

Exclusive | The world’s 100 most visited art museums in 2025: new venues a big hit with visitors – The Art Newspaper

1-54 New York Lines-Up More Than 20 Exhibitors for 2026 Fair

Mexico’s art community calls for greater transparency in management of treasured collection – The Art Newspaper

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Racist Defacement of Paola Egonu Mural Sparks Outrage Across Italy Racist Defacement of Paola Egonu Mural Sparks Outrage Across Italy
Next Article a place of learning on the road a place of learning on the road
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BublikArt GalleryBublikArt Gallery
2024 © BublikArt Gallery. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Security
  • About
  • Collaboration
  • Contact
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?