A federal lawsuit alleges that a government initiative created by the Trump administration relied on the generative AI software ChatGPT to help identify grants tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. The lawsuit alleges that a grant awarded to the High Point Museum in North Carolina to replace its HVAC system was flagged as related to DEI and subsequently canceled.
According to a report by Fox 8 News, High Point received s $349,000 grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities to replace outdated climate-control equipment used to preserve its collections. The funding was later canceled after staff working for the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, reviewed grant proposals with the help of the AI chatbot.
The revelation surfaced in a lawsuit brought by the American Council of Learned Societies and the American Historical Association, which are challenging a broader wave of humanities grant cancellations. The groups argue that the cuts were unlawful and violated the First Amendment.
DOGE was established by executive order in January 2025 and was tasked with reviewing federal spending across government agencies, including humanities grants administered by the NEH.
In a deposition included in the lawsuit, DOGE staffer Justin Fox said employees used ChatGPT to analyze grant descriptions and determine whether they related to DEI programs. Staff recorded the chatbot’s responses, along with its explanations, in a spreadsheet that helped guide decisions about which grants to cancel.
According to the American Historical Association, the spreadsheet ultimately replaced a list previously compiled by NEH staff to identify grants targeted for cuts.
One entry examined the High Point Museum’s request for funds to upgrade its HVAC system. The museum argued that improved climate control would help preserve objects in its collection and expand access to them over time.
After reviewing the description, ChatGPT responded that the project did relate to DEI, because improved preservation conditions would support “greater access to diverse audiences.”
The museum’s director, Edith Brady, said the institution had already begun work before the grant was terminated, though it recovered roughly 70 percent of the award through a termination clause.
Other grants flagged in the spreadsheet included a proposal from North Carolina Central University, a historically Black university, to develop teaching materials using digital archival collections. ChatGPT also classified that project as related to DEI.
Attorneys for the academic groups argue the process shows how the administration replaced expert review with a rushed system that relied on an AI chatbot.
“The facts in this case have exposed the administration’s total disregard for the democratic process and for the value of the humanities that the NEH exists to promote,” Paula Krebs, executive director of the Modern Language Association, said in a statement given to Fox 8.
